[SABRMnLgs]

I have spent over an hour skimming through the rantings of many who are either pro or con on two issues. Makes for very interesting reading (I think). But pro or con which issue?
Some are concerned with the issue. Others seem more concerned with the messenger of the issue. Not yet a resident, I am very neutral at this point. But to you folks who think tee-times and lunchs are so important, realize this. At some point, you are the people who may end up paying the piper.
And I would bet the two bucks in my wallet, you would be the first to go into apoplectic shock if you got a bill to solve this thing.
Agaim, I state, I am neutral. I have no feelings one way or the other. But a journalist does not fish for stories. They are assigned to her by her heirarchy at the newspaper. She must do her research, and then report her findings.
Now because some Villagers don't like her or the facts she presents (which is proofread by her editors by the way) she is labled.
I was in journalism for a number of years (albeit part-time and very free-lance) but the facts hold true.
You are most certainly welcome to voice your opinion on the facts, but because you don't agree with those facts, leave the name calling of the people who write about it, outside the door. It is so juvenile and tainted.
As Joe Friday used to say, "The facts, Ma'am. All we want are the facts".