Come on, you can't be "biased" against your self! If the paper is, as it is alleged owned by the developer then it is not "biased" as it is his way of expressing himself. The problem is the competition is in other forms of the media, (e.g. Talk of the Villages, etc) which many should but don't read. There is a contingency of residents who either work for, or have fanatical love and devotion for the developer. I have in the past supported his actions and the ability to create a community so unique and wonderful as The Villages. My positive reactions to his Management of such a complicated set of business decisions was impacted when it was brought out that he or his organization was allegedly bribing a State Legislature and he or his organization was denying some to make a living by
signing them up as Real Estate Contractors and then allegedly using them as employees. Any 1st line manager in a major corporation knows the rules on this and is warned not to allow it to happen. Because the Sun does not do investigative work and since it is well known that allegedly it is an arm of the Developer then why be surprised at its reporting. It does provide a lot of local information, sports, etc.then it is worth the subscription but it is up to the reader to separate the politics from the wheat.
