Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanFL
.
.
"LITTLE PARTS"???? "out of context"... Did you Not see the quotes???
You>
"not giving unsupported arguments equal time"
BASED UPON WHAT AND WHO?
"Our duty is to be fair to the truth."
WHO'S TRUTH???
" Finally, misinformation should not be a matter of opinion."
WHO'S OPINION???
"If there are no demonstrable facts presented, or at least scientific consensus, then it is opinion."
WHO'S OPINION???
Do YOU NOT see a dichotomy here? ...if you don't know what that means, here it is:
something with qualities or features that seem to conflict with one another
I ALWAYS look on the other side of an argument. Would YOU feel the same way about this if it was said by a Fox News anchor or such? please...
.
.
|
In the past few years, we have been burdened with outlandish statements to defend bizarre behavior. Most of those statements were either a new conspiracy theory or defamation of a person...Much of those came from our top people in government.
While, most (Greatest part) of them were flat out lies, because the United States Government was involved, it became a joke trying to follow the lunacy.
So many on here cried out for the days of the evening news and the sanity......in those days when America was great, and conspiracy theories were reserved for the grocery store checkout line, we had civil conversations, with never a nod to the whacky headlines we saw checking out.
Holt simply said it well, in saying these things deserve no attention. You can say (in a nod to MLB opening day) that you were cheated while video shows there was no cheating. We have wasted a lot of time chasing these things (which probably was their intent) but they serve no purpose in a civil society.