I was trying to stay out of this fray BUT twice now there has been a reference to 2/3rd's of the residents supporting the paper, etc etc. This is the kind of statistical misbehavior that leads to on going propaganda. The question is when was the survey taken, who and how was it controlled, where is the supporting data base that can be reviewed, etc. It is not only misleading to assert a statistic that has no support behind it but to do so with unfounded authority.
