[DeanFL]

Comments in YELLOW below>>>

Originally Posted by dr winston o boogie jr

one of the things that the sheriff said was that there is a privacy issue. We obviously don't know what that is and some people are going to assume that it's part of some kind of cover up.

What privacy issue?

I try to not assume anything.

We are not either - facts speak

i don't know exactly what happened and neither does anyone else on this forum. I'm not sure that tiger or the la sheriff knows either.

So the public should not question this?

Tiger haters have already made up their minds and nothing, even if proof came out totally exonerating him came out, is going to change their minds?

Not a tiger hater - will be an albatross for him

could he have just been being reckless and going 83 on purpose? Possibly, of course.

"I try to not assume anything." from you... an assumption.


Could the sheriff be trying to cover up for him? Possibly, but what would the sheriff have to gain by doing that?

I could think of ten reasons why...

Could there be some other reason that this happened? Also possibly.

Which is exactly why the public who support tiger would like the truth, to put it all to rest.