[Tmarkwald]

Originally Posted by roscoguy

Pretty humorous, but no, you still haven't supplied a single source for your original rant that claimed: And I'm fairly sure you didn't bother to either read the articles I posted links to or do your own version of the search that I did.



Oh, I understand. (And, hey, you finally got something right, yourself (see above in red)) There was no cherry picking involved, at least from my end: I provided the first 5 hits from the search I stated. When I first responded to the 'definitive statement' from Tmarkwald that said - - I read through the first dozen or so, all of which concluded that nobody seems to knows for sure.


Ooops, the 'overwhelming majority' seems just a little bit less positive than all that "Period. PERIOD!!!!!" nonsense above. I'm not the one parsing words either: my original question was whether there was any backup to the opinion that Tmarkwald stated. There has been none, merely stridently expressed opinion by yourself, condescension & backtracking about what was supposedly implied when you stated positively that "If you are fully vaccinated you CANNOT get the virus, you CANNOT spread the virus, and you CANNOT infect others. Period. PERIOD!!!!!." And I don't care about the 5% figure that you insist means having no immunity. This is flat out false, I have pointed out already.

Actual bottom line: still a nope.

I feel like I've joined a debating club!

HOWEVER - this seems pretty intersting:

If you get the vaccine but later test positive for COVID-19, that is proof that you did not mount a response to the vaccine.

If the coronavirus vaccine is 95% effective, how will you know if you’re in the other 5%? - cleveland.com