notable absence of several participants who were extremely active all last year.
I don't know what constitutes being a "regular" on the political forum so I can't make a judgment in that regard.
One had said maybe they are away for a while, but most of us know that as long as one has access to a computer, being away is not a real argument unless you are on a cruise some where or out of the country.

But as the saying goes, if one cannot stand the heat then absent yourself from the kitchen.

In our family there are some very staunch supporters of both parties. We all know each others stand, no matter the subject, nor whether right or wrong. We know what string to pull to launch a tirade, we know what box they will charge from on given subjects. We also know when to put up the white, time out flag. But nobody would stoop to not participating...it would be viewed as a sign of weakness.

The few things I object to are a challenge or question about a specific launching a tirade of Bush bashing or Obama bashing and the specific being completely ignored.

I object to the Nancy Pelosi stated principal that if it is from the opposition I am against it.

And I have a hard time with folks telling me what they thought I said when their interpretation is out in left field.

Lastly the never ending need for some to lay blame instead of addressing the subject.

What is important is each and every comment is some ones opinion, what they believe, right or wrong...some however seem to expect blind tolerance or you are against a subject or individual. That is easily handled by just ignoring it and participating.

I would never back away from an energetic discussion on any subject, just because of a few bumps in the road or because I don't think someone isn't playing by MY rules..

Remember, no struggle no process.

BTK