Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl
Well no one can say the developers are "Law suit happy". They have ignored many things over the years that could easily be won that to me were libelous or slanderous. They are very quiet people and do not seek attention.
It appears to me that they felt this was important enough to establish a legal "tenant". Probably to protect their right to sell new homes in some way.
I do not think it was about the money, but about the principal. IMHO
|
GG, may I respectfully suggest you intended "legal precedent"... and also "principle"? Precedent | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
IMHO theft of intellectual property was a significant issue of the lawsuit, especially that of trade secrets, primarily the customers list. Trade Secret Protection for Customer Lists: A Checklist | Fish & Richardson - JDSupra
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato
“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine
Last edited by manaboutown; 05-16-2021 at 04:07 PM.
|