Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortal1
An article that only uses a minute percentage of actual covid infected people is not a reliable source for the information the article proposes. Were they asked if they experienced these "long term" issues before they got covid? I would also want to know who funds this magazine. Lastly it has only been a year or so since the first Americans got covid and that is hardly long term as many who get pneumonia without covid experience issue up to a year or more. Many hip, knee, should replacement recipients also have proven long term effects.
I never just get one side of things and expect it to be the gods honest truth. In this day and age a person must question any result based on such a small sampling...unless, of course, they only care to hear one side of an issue.
It would seem the only reason for your post is to convince those who haven't had the vaccine do so because you just care so much as to what they could, might, may experience without the vaccine. I don't believe that is the actual reason.
|
And it seems like YOUR reason for the post is to convince others to REFRAIN from getting the vaccine. And I feel that reason is pure propaganda! It also seems to me like the sample size was appropriate for an EARLY study. People are NOT getting the vaccine in a high enough percentage to achieve herd immunity. So, you have won with your propaganda, you can give it a rest. The US has been sufficiently weakened and the PANDEMIC will be with us for years. Hope the anti-vaxxers are happy - they have set American Democracy and Science back toward the medieval times. I know V.Putin IS happy!