Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
I wonder why you would cherry pick those details.
|
That's rich. Given you did exactly as you accused me of doing (your posts are cherry-picked down to the pits.)
6-1 in favor of BC. 2 justices questioned if Castor had the authority to do what he did. “We should reject Castor’s misguided notion outright and declare that district attorneys do not possess this effective pardon power,”
Justice Kevin Dougherty wrote in a partial dissent.
But they didn't reject outright, did they? Instead, they overturned the lower Court's ruling.
And the Court would have found in favor of BC again re: allowing 5 accusers to testify at 2nd trial, according to every legal expert I've heard discussing the issue.
BTW, thanks for the lesson on 'innocent until proven guilty', I did not know that's how it all worked.