Quote:
Originally Posted by Becca9800
What I know is the 1st prosecutor states he didn't have evidence to convict, 1st trial ended w hung jury. Doesn't appear there was clear and convincing evidence of guilt, does there? 2nd trial was during the peak of the bullsh!t Me Too Movement and 50 more women come forward. What are the odds that all 50 experienced assault by BC and NONE of the 50 reported the event when it happened? 50. At the 2nd trial the "victim" beefed up the details of the alleged molestation, her testimony changed. At the 2nd trial the judge allowed 5 of those 50 accusers testify. None reported their assaults but they testified to it as if fact. I don't stand by BC, I stand with any person being accused decades later of a crime that may not have happened. Show me the proof. In this case, there wasn't the proof to send a man to prison. Ask any trial attorney if jurors tend to find with the facts or with their hearts.
FWIW, I think the 2nd prosecutor, the one who stepped all over BC's 5th A rights, should be criminally charged and civilly accountable. THAT should never be acceptable to any American citizen. Why aren't you concerned about that piece?
|
HE ADMITTED that he did it. He is guilty, and we know he's guilty, because he admitted to committing the crime, and admitted that he committed it not just on one woman, but on multiple women, at different times. He admitted that he slipped quaaludes into drinks that his victims drank, and then took advantage of their inebriation to have sex with them while they were unable to withhold consent.
The reason this is a big deal is NOT because he's innocent. It's NOT because we "don't know" enough. It's NOT because he "might not have done it." The reason it's a big deal is because he admitted it in exchange for immunity against criminal prosecution during a civil suit, and then the prosecution reneged on their promise.
That's why it's a big deal.