
08-14-2021, 12:14 PM
|
Senior Member
|
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 278
Thanks: 0
Thanked 338 Times in 124 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
Well that was an interesting reply to my post asking that you explain your supposed credentials. Completely ignored that didn't you. And you have posted about VAERS just as I wrote and as you acknowledged.
Like this gem:
Where you tell your readers that the VAERS data under reports and because you are so much more qualified than the people at the FDA, those who've devoted their professional careers to actually studying infectious disease, pharmacy, virology.... You have the unmitigated gall to suggest that based on your expert opinion as a "doctor" that if the FDA approves the vaccines they are no longer trustworthy.
I know who is on my list of untrustworthy. Do you know what the time period between the phase three trials of the polio vaccine and approval and a massive federal and state plan to give that completely new kind of vaccine to children was? Should the FDA have withheld its approval for 5 or 10 years to see how those kids who were in the phase three trials did over time to be sure there were not some very long range concerns? Maybe you can look it up and report back on how long the government took to approve a vaccine that was killing.. wait for it.... about 3,000 people a year in this country.
We have had over 40,000 deaths from COVID in Florida alone, but you'd like the FDA to wait how long? If they wait one year you'll demand 2. If they wait two years you'll demand 5
Doctor Ducat, what length of time, based on your expertise in these fields, is long enough for the FDA to wait to give full approval to get your oh so important seal of excellence and stay on your trustworthy list? /s
|
Read it.....from Nature Mag...Very very possible yet to come.
Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies | Nature Microbiology
|