Quote:
Originally Posted by PennBF
It is amazing how many respondents have found excuses to justify planting a major and serious Virus treatment in the center of an active area and in a building that is where they will treat a total of 300 patients a day. We even have some that try to justify it as the
one being treated would not move about the area at the stores and restaurants? Of course there is still the point they h ave not as yet ruled out the virus spreading in the air thus one of the reasons for the push for masks. Those who think this is OK and work to find reasons to believe this is just business as usual and disregard any concern about placing a serious medical facility in the center of an open population should visit the ICU at the hospital to get an idea of what their future looks like.  |
It's amazing how many times I have to post the same thing.
So to repeat from the last page:
I don't know. If they are responsible they won't. If they tested positive they are supposed to self-quarantine and wear a mask if they must go out for essentials, of which the monoclonal therapy would qualify. But if they go out "shopping, eating and drinking at Brownwood", they will go out and do that everywhere else as well. So once again, better they are treated than not.
You are not at risk because people who tested COVID positive are outdoors in the same town square. PERIOD.
Yes, "they" have ruled out the virus spreading "by air"
The virus is NOT airborne and that is NOT the reason for masks.
However, the longer we have a significant percentage of people who go unvaccinated, the more likely a mutation might make the jump to become airborne, and then we're in a whole new ballgame.