Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
I extracted this from a longer post because it reflects a lack of understanding, which is correctable by information, if the person is interested in learning.
Are you getting the picture?
Are you angry about that?
So now that you've learned why the CDC is involved in gun violence research, do you now trust it on other issues?
|
You seem to think I'm angry but your post makes it clear, at least to me, that you're the one that is angry. And condescending. Investigating gun violence was just one example. I didn't think anyone would think it was the sole reason I don't always accept government sources.
The answer to your last question is a resounding, 'no'. You left out an important part of the post. I'll research other sites to
refute or validate.
I'll bet you a friendly beer that when the CDC provides its findings it will include remedies such as gun control, gun confiscation, ammo bans and the like. I think it has pre-drawn conclusions and is agenda driven. If this administration was really concerned with gun violence, it would start with law and order initiatives/directives in our inner cities where the vast majority of gun violence occurs. I don't need a CDC study to know that.