Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123
I agree, but it appears that the only reason for becoming a non-profit was because it would be illegal to charge people to watch free over-the-air channels. They could be sued by the free networks. Many people who set up and operate non-profit companies pay almost all of the extra income to themselves as a salary. Also, there are many streaming services that provide pay channels for about the same cost as the donations that Locast asked for.
|
Could you list a couple of streaming services that provide live local tv for a price similar to Locast? Hulu and YouTube each charge about ten times what Locast was requesting. (I believe Roku is in the same range but I can't confirm that)
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
Last edited by Bill14564; 09-02-2021 at 11:44 AM.
|