Quote:
Originally Posted by Malsua
Change the subject?
My post is EXACTLY THE SUBJECT.
The polybasic Furin Cleavage site is why Sars-cov2 infects humans so well. The Delta varient even improved on it by changing the P in PRRA to RRRA. This makes it fuse exceptionally easily.
PRRA is used in Gain of Function research and not found in nature in these bat corona viruses. It is there because a human put it there in a Laboratory.
|
Then your evidence that the virus was created in China is the presence of the cleavage site.
The cleavage site could ONLY be put there in a laboratory AND that particular cleavage site could ONLY be put there in a laboratory in China. Otherwise, if it could have occurred in nature then the cleavage site isn't evidence that it was man-made and if a laboratory elsewhere in the world has the technology to insert it then it isn't evidence that it was created in China.
Do I really need to take the time to copy the links to show that this isn't the slam dunk proof you seem to imply?
Could it have been man-made? Absolutely. Could it have been made in China? Absolutely. Is the presence of the cleavage site indisputable evidence that the SARS-Cov-2 virus was made in a lab in Wuhan China? Absolutely not.