Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
Then your evidence that the virus was created in China is the presence of the cleavage site.
The cleavage site could ONLY be put there in a laboratory AND that particular cleavage site could ONLY be put there in a laboratory in China. Otherwise, if it could have occurred in nature then the cleavage site isn't evidence that it was man-made and if a laboratory elsewhere in the world has the technology to insert it then it isn't evidence that it was created in China.
Do I really need to take the time to copy the links to show that this isn't the slam dunk proof you seem to imply?
Could it have been man-made? Absolutely. Could it have been made in China? Absolutely. Is the presence of the cleavage site indisputable evidence that the SARS-Cov-2 virus was made in a lab in Wuhan China? Absolutely not.
|
Is it indisputable evidence? No. Is it evidence beyond a reasonable doubt? Yes.
The polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA in bat corona viruses does not exist in nature in 2019. Got that?
All the sudden it emerges in humans in 2019. In fact, it emerges in 3 workers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
WIV does gain of function research with bat corona viruses. WIV does GOF research using a poly basic furin cleavage site PRRA.
When you hear hoof beats, you think horses not zebras.
Could someone, somewhere else have done the insert, carried it to Wuhan, found 3 laboratory workers, infected them and set the whole thing off? Sure, I guess. Could monkeys exit your posterior and take flight? Sure, it's about as likely.