Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucco
Interesting developments today.....
"President Obama’s national intelligence director told colleagues in a private memo last week that the harsh interrogation techniques banned by the White House did produce significant information that helped the nation in its struggle with terrorists.
“High value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qa’ida organization that was attacking this country,” Adm. Dennis C. Blair, the intelligence director, wrote in a memo to his staff last Thursday."
AND WORTH NOTING...
"Admiral Blair’s assessment that the interrogation methods did produce important information was deleted from a condensed version of his memo released to the media last Thursday. Also deleted was a line in which he empathized with his predecessors who originally approved some of the harsh tactics after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“I like to think I would not have approved those methods in the past,” he wrote, “but I do not fault those who made the decisions at that time, and I will absolutely defend those who carried out the interrogations within the orders they were given.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30335592/
|
I am not in the least surprised.
Question: If anyone of you had a darling sweet 6 year old daughter who was kidnapped by a pair of prior conviction rapists/sociopaths and 1 of the 2 perps was captured and knew where your daughter was... and hypothetically you could, would you authorize these coersive interrogation techniques to get the perp to talk?