Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces4
Isn’t it interesting when factual cases are dismissed because they don’t conform to one’s ideology. This is what scary, sweep the truth under the rug and listen to the mantra.
Those statistics should be totally public. But if those numbers are as skewed and manipulated as were the actual deaths from Covid19 numbers, why bother? All the people who were dying and got covid, died as anticipated.
|
This is medical science, "ideology" has nothing to do with it. I don't know your ideology and you don't know mine.
So, scientifically, how is anyone to know that these anecdotes are "factual cases". Where's the proof, the scientific proof? Is the whole world just supposed to take someone's word for it? And even if they are trying to be truthful, their facts and conclusions are probably way off the mark
What needs to be done to answer to question would be a large, multi-centered, randomized, double blind study. Take 5,000 people who have been vaccinated and 5,000 that refused and test them weekly for COVID and interview them for symptoms. Keep a chart of when they were vaccinated. Then we could get a better idea of the breakthrough rate as well as the time course of immunity from the vaccine. I don't know of any group that is actually conducting such a study. The unethical study would be to take the 2 groups and expose them at the same time. Much better data, would never get through an ethical review board NOR SHOULD IT