Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces4
Isn’t it interesting when factual cases are dismissed because they don’t conform to one’s ideology. This is what scary, sweep the truth under the rug and listen to the mantra.
Those statistics should be totally public. But if those numbers are as skewed and manipulated as were the actual deaths from Covid19 numbers, why bother? All the people who were dying and got covid, died as anticipated.
|
The statistics are public and are not skewed or manipulated.
The factual cases DO conform to expectations. No vaccine is 100% effective and there will be breakthrough cases. In fact, as discussed several times before, during the trials the count of the number of vaccinated individuals who became hospitalized was needed to calculate effectiveness. A VERY SMALL NUMBER of hospitalizations and even deaths in vaccinated people is expected.
The number of vaccinated people becoming infected with Covid cannot be tracked accurately. Counting the number of positive test results in vaccinated people would only capture those that came in for testing which most would not. Rather than provide a number that would immediately be criticized as an undercount the CDC chose to capture a more meaningful number. Since the vaccine was designed and tested to prevent sickness, they now count the number of vaccinated who are hospitalized. This would show a true breakthrough case since it is a case where the disease broke through the protection against illness that the vaccine was providing. This number is available on the CDC website.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|