Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Independent of Developer??
View Single Post
 
Old 04-28-2009, 09:46 AM
GrayGoose's Avatar
GrayGoose GrayGoose is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Indiana,California,Texas,Florida
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Villages district supervisor election process

Quote:
Originally Posted by Army Guy View Post
Ok, I saw this quote in a post by Ijusloveit on the Taxes thread:

The three oldest villages have become "independent" of the Developer on their recent 15th birthdays, meaning they are now more responsible for infrastructure costs.

Can someone explain this? Does this mean that at 15 years all villages become on their own? Do they still have access to amenties, etc? Is this in the rules and regulations.

Thanks, Army Guy
The legislature, in creating Chapter 190, recognized that in order to maintain continuity of the facilities provided to the newly developing community, the developer, who then owns the majority of the land, should be granted the right to substantially complete the project as envisioned by the various land use and zoning approvals that were obtained as part of the development review process. However, the legislature also recognized that at the time prescribed by statute, control should transition to the residents. Therefore, at the election held in 2006, three of the five Supervisors were elected by landowner vote (one vote per lot owned and/or one vote per acre owned). The same process will occur in 2008. In 2010, one supervisor will be elected by landowners and two supervisors will be elected by “qualified electors” (registered voters) residing in CDD No. 7. From that point forward, all elections will be qualified based elections. This election conversion format ensures that the residents ultimately control the level of service provided to the infrastructure facilities that the District maintains.
__________________
INDIANA, IOWA, CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, FLORIDA