Quote:
Originally Posted by midiwiz
since the answers are "all over the road" (as usual) Here's the thing -
If it can be proved that every time (key phrase) someone sets foot in front of that house the sprinklers go on AND that it's vengeful, you have a case..
If it isn't every time then you have a$$h&&&s which gets handled differently - typically confrontation.
In order to prove this you'll need videos with time and date stamps over several days. Yes it's a lot of work, and people like this count on the fact that no one (especially here) will bother - however Ring has made this so very easy. You just need a Ring cam (any wifi motion activated cam will do) and it needs to be set up to trigger on that property and it's movement. one key factor to note is Ring is highly admissible where some cheap off brand may not be. Call it name notoriety
All this about where are the sprinklers pointing is BS nitpick junk, water in the road etc has ZERO bearing on this. You need to establish if this is purposeful.
I much prefer confrontation first, it might settle the reasoning portion. Also you know what you are dealing with and then it's easier to deal with.
|
A Case for WHAT? There is no Case here, there is no wrong doing. Turning on your sprinklers to keep someone from your property is not illegal.