Quote:
Originally Posted by Laker14
can you provide links to validate that claim about how the "best/most respected paleoclimatologists" feel? I'd like to know how you come to that conclusion?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laker14
Yes, I mentioned a few pages ago that I can't find your post with that link. I just read through the entire thread again, and still can't find the link. I remember seeing it once, but not opening it.
Would you mind posting the link again?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
|
Well, I just read that article. The "ABC" in that link, BTW, stands for Australian Broadcast Company, I think. The article seems to have been written by a 13 year old, or maybe FOR 13 year olds. Nowhere in the article does it make any claim whatsoever that climate change is not caused by humans.
Nowhere in the article does it make any mention of "the best/most respected paleoclimatologists", in fact it quotes 1 (one) paleoclimatoligist from the University of Tasmania, who states "There's no chance of us going into an ice age now because the greenhouse gases we've put into the atmosphere during the industrial era have warmed the earth." (
)
I could be wrong but it seems to me the article you link to refutes, rather than supports your claims that climate change is not caused by, and has not been caused by human activity.