Quote:
Originally Posted by Toymeister
I see the establishment of two PWACs as a good thing. The areas and the buildings covered by the PWACs were built, and we be built, at different times.
Let me explain. The PWAC north of 44 is on average 13 (+/-) years old. The PWAC south of 44 hasn't reached its median age but it's likely it will be 2028. A spread of 20 years.
If something arises in the north PWAC that requires an expenditure from the PWAC, why should the areas with the newest facilities (lowest risk) pay for the older areas?
|
Isnt it like social security? We need new workers coming in to keep the benefits flowing to the oldsters? Kind of like a giant ponzi scheme?