Quote:
Originally Posted by Proveone
The judge is a nut case. He is an elected official and playing to his "audience". Pathetic human being! The prosecution is inept. Rittenhouse should have stuck to video games. He will be a "marked" person if he gets off. By the way, so that's how you entertain yourself with popcorn?
|
So if Rittenhouse is found not guilty by reason of self defense, you find it perfectly acceptable to post a threat?
You do realize that the judge is trying to work around the deliberate prosecutorial misconduct in this trial? I believe that the prosecutor (based upon his star witness admitting he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse BEFORE he was shot, and the other prosecution witness saying under oath that the prosecutor's office tried to get him to change his statement) is trying to "tank" this trial as he knows his case is most likely a lost cause. The prosecutor doesn't want "the loss", so he is hoping to force the judge to render a mistrial. I don't believe that the judge wants to take the case away from the jury, as he stopped himself from openly, on the record, indicating that the prosecutor has crossed the line and provided grounds for mistrial or appeal.
Again, why aren't people concerned that a prosecutor would DELIBERATELY violate Rittenhouse's constitutional rights to remain silent? It doesn't matter if he is found guilty or not guilty, the prosecutor should be sanctioned for misconduct at the least.