Quote:
Originally Posted by MDLNB
This has nothing to do with the current case in the News.
It's about as relevant as this scenario:
A guy goes into the woods searching for firewood. He comes across a bear(or a wolf ,or a pack of wolves) and the bear charges. Hunting season is not for several more months. Does the guy shoot to defend himself or goes by the law and gets eaten? If he is in the woods seeking firewood, why does he have a gun on him? He says it is to protect himself from predators.
|
I never said it applied to Rittenhouse which was an entirely different scenario. Was addressing the scenario in question, which was extremely limited in information.
The consequences for shooting a person are potentially more severe than shooting wild life, thus I would not equate the scenarios.