It boils down to a law was broken, and a jury of her peers got to consider all the evidence before rendering their verdict. I don’t think anyone can dispute that is the way it should work.
Maybe the laws could be changed - you could certainly debate that. But at least in this case it appears that the system has worked the way it was designed.
The verdict seems sound. I hope some leniency is given during sentencing because I don’t think it was intentional, just negligent.
|