For those of you who insist we "need to hear both sides of the story", that would be nice. However, since the biter's owner left the scene, why are we giving him the benefit of the doubt?
The circumstances of the bite are immaterial. What is material here is that the owner of the biting dog took his dog, and LEFT THE SCENE without providing contact information or vaccination information. That is all that really matters here.
If anything, it leads me to believe that the owner of the biting dog doesn't want "both sides of the story" to be told. I he did, he wouldn't have fled.
|