Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte1
Thank you for pointing that out.
|
Stupid as in you believe it would be stupid.
I'm a rugged individualist and understand what government overreach is. But I also understand that rights come with RESPONSIBILITIES. I'm all for a person to be free to not wear a helmet, but that I also that person should be responsible for his injuries.
Seems like you want the rights, then demand I pay for someone else's irresponsibility.
As I posted earlier, let em go without helmets as long as they have insurance to cover that choice.