Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinSE
I did not "attack the source", I simply pointed out some background for anyone not familiar with AEI. I am sorry you feel having the AEI's background factually pointed out is an attack.
I didn't say they lie, I didn't say the article you referred to was wrong, I did say they have an interest, based on their background in leaning to one interpretation vs another. I think that is fair. Sorry if you don't.
|
You gave no evidence of said bias. You gave no evidence they were wrong. So why point out some "possible" bias, based on some boogeyman of some "possible" interest (which you also gave no evidence of)?
The only reason I can see was to disparage them...