Quote:
Originally Posted by shut the front door
CDD 6 Board Chairman John Calandro said that his district suffered a $236,000 hit to the budget because of CDD 7’s decision not to vote in favor of the creation of a second Project Wide Advisory Committee, for community development districts south of State Road 44. The creation of a PWAC 2 could have provided substantial savings for CDDs remaining in the original PWAC. District officials last year provided figures that estimated CDDs south of County Road 466 suffered a hit of about $1 million due CDD 7’s failure to sign onto the PWAC II agreement.
From the site we can't mention.
|
This makes no sense to me. It seems to be saying that one district is suing another district for not joining with them to help the first district save money? Seriously? Can I sue my next door neighbor for not joining Sams Club with me? I mean I could have save money using the referral reward!