Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Once again, I don't know of anyone who accused Disney of "grooming" their guests. Fantasize much????
And if, as you stated, "there is no sexual orientation taught in public schools in K-5", then the parent's rights law is irrelevant, so why all the LGBQTXYZ and "woke" protests??????
|
Because the reality of how the law is written and how it is likely to be used is far different from the marketing that was used to sell it to the public. While the word "gay" does not appear in the bill, neither does the word "anti-grooming." The vague wording of the bill makes it frightening to those who have reason to believe it will be used against them.
Interestingly, the vague wording of the bill also opens the possibility of it being used against those who championed it. The law doesn't say gay and it doesn't say trans, the law says sexual orientation. If we can't discuss Sally's two dads because that is grooming or indoctrination or teaching of sexual orientation then how can we discuss Bambi's mother and father, is that not also teaching a sexual orientation?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|