Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
Because the reality of how the law is written and how it is likely to be used is far different from the marketing that was used to sell it to the public. While the word "gay" does not appear in the bill, neither does the word "anti-grooming." The vague wording of the bill makes it frightening to those who have reason to believe it will be used against them.
Interestingly, the vague wording of the bill also opens the possibility of it being used against those who championed it. The law doesn't say gay and it doesn't say trans, the law says sexual orientation. If we can't discuss Sally's two dads because that is grooming or indoctrination or teaching of sexual orientation then how can we discuss Bambi's mother and father, is that not also teaching a sexual orientation?
|
Agreed, that is why the law (passed, no longer a bill) states sexual orientation, not specifically targeting ANY ONE sexual orientation. I don't want my 5 year old grandchild getting taught what mommy and daddy do in their bedroom any more than being taught how two men "express their love"
As far as certain groups being "afraid" the law will be used against them----get over it, a lot of things in this world are frightening. And if it actually gets used in that way, there is legal recourse