Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Unbelievable. First of all , it is no longer a "proposal", it is a LAW.
Second, please explain how a law that prohibits the teaching of sexual orientation to 5-8 year old children affects their "employees and guests"?????
And third, for the 20th time, it is not the obligation of a publicly traded corporation to "state their opinion" and if they do there are possible consequences (such as rescinding the Reedy Creek special district and losing 35 billion in market capitalization), not to mention if their profit decreases due to their "stating their opinion" the entire board of Disney could be sued by its shareholders for breach of fiduciary responsibility.
|
A law "to prohibit" something that only exists as a conspiracy theory in the minds of culture warriors is a law about a problem that does NOT exist. A law that is a solution to a "make-believe:" problem is a law ginned up to create culture-war controversy and make an impression and get US-wide publicity (under the theory that even BAD publicity is good publicity. V. Putin stated that truth is non-existent and possibilities are endless! maybe this is a case of endless possibilities in Florida.
........Disney simply said that this situation is bizzaro and simply wrongheaded. I come down on Disney's side on this important controversy and I imagine so do most right-thinking Americans.