Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Maybe. But they are almost guaranteed to be among the overwhelming majority of parents who don't want sexual orientation taught in school to their 5 year old.
There's a big difference between objecting to or discriminating against a specific sexual orientation (or race, or religion) and objecting to that sexual orientation being taught to 5 year olds.
|
And there is a big difference between indoctrination or "sexual orientation taught in school to their 5 year old" and accepting that Johnny has two dad's and that's okay.
Notice that the LAW (as you put it) doesn't mention teaching at all. (wouldn't it be nice if people actually read what they are arguing about?) As pointed out, it also doesn't mention "gay" at all either. While many of those concerned parents are cheering now that their precious little darlings won't have to hear about "those people" they may not be so happy later if the language (or lack of) in their prized LAW is used against them.
We'll see what happens. If I was good at predicting the future my portfolio would include my recent lottery winnings.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|