Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie0723
Have not read the entire thread...
Why not add a tax on Disney to cover their infrastructure cost savings on services transfered to the counties. They will primarily continue to be for Disney's benefit.
Seems there are multiple options to do so.
|
There is no infrastructure cost savings to them. They pay 100% of the infrastructure costs, the residents of that district pay NOTHING. That is part of the deal they get. In exchanged for tax reductions, they pay for the roads, water and fire services, and various other expenses to the entire district - which includes private residences and businesses that are not owned by Disney.