Yes? No? Maybe so?
Once upon a time the decision to buy a retirement home was easier. When the market was hot, or even when the market was just plain normal, a lot of buyers figured that if they bought and then for some reason needed or wanted to sell, it would be relatively easy to turn the property around fairly quickly.
Now Gray Goose says that recent bumps in TV’s pendings have been mostly on the low end. So who are those buyers? Those who want only to be landlords? Or maybe speculators?
Well, for what it’s worth, I think maybe TV is seeing buyers, for now, coming in with far greater caution than in the past. Tiptoeing in, getting the lay of the land, making sure it is what they want. Those types of buyers have always been there, but I bet there are more for now.
You know, many of us are used to our real estate taking really good care of us. Not only have we never lost money in real estate, but we may have become used to expecting some really seriously lovely profits. But now we know that was once upon a time. And the happy ending is not a sure thing.
The psychology of the market may be that retirement home buyers, in particular, are finding themselves in what, to some, may be a period of adjustment, while to others it is reality therapy. No longer throwing caution to the wind.
So who are those buyers of those lower cost TV homes? Landlords? Speculators? Maybe. But I have a feeling that a few could have been renting for awhile, maybe even for years. Some of those renters, who really love it in TV, perhaps have decided, after weighing the cost of years of renting, that it might make sense to just buy in on the lower cost end now. (In fact, I know somebody who did that. So that’s one.)
And there could be a larger number of those lower end buyers who plan to live there year round but are just being a lot more cautious than they might have been before all this economic mess. I know that people change houses in TV all the time, smaller to bigger, bigger to smaller. But I bet a bigger percentage start smaller now with a wait and see attitude. And if they come in with cash, they just might be holding onto a chunk of it by buying smaller than originally planned. Holding some back for stuffing the mattress. Stuffing the mattress with cash can go a long way for that cost of sleep factor. There has to be more mattress stuffing going on with the retirement home market now. And TV provides such a range of choices in houses. And everybody gets access to the same things. And the sunshine is everywhere.
But my little theory should not make anybody sad for the future of selling bigger homes in TV. My theory says that when the dust settles, those buyers coming in smaller will move up to the higher end in a larger percentage than usual.
So that is the trend theory according to Boomer. Please remember that it is totally useless, worthless information coming from me. Heck, I am in Ohio. I am not a real estate agent. Once had a license long ago. But I never really used it. Just wanted to know about real estate.
But I think if I were an agent in TV, I would be saying, “Gimme all those lower end listings I can get." Sure an agent would have to sell more of them to equal the price of one big sale. But if done right, I bet the agent will have a lot of repeat buyers down the road. All agents love those big sales, but getting those sales in today's market is not easy. I guess agents have to sell those smaller sales, in relation to bigger sales, at 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 maybe. So, for now, I guess the attitude has to be "If You're Not With The One You Love, Love The One You're With."
(But I really do not know anything about what's going on with real estate trends in TV. I am just sitting here typing because it started raining on me while I was working outside. So I hurried inside, lest I melt, and the next thing I know, here I am typing a bunch of you know what.)
Boomer, in theory
Last edited by Boomer; 06-16-2009 at 02:21 PM.
|