Quote:
Originally Posted by MDLNB
Yes, it protected at least 600 of them when the Border Patrol officer used his weapon to put the killer down.
You can use a gun against a killer with a gun, but it's kind of hard to use a bomb against a killer with a bomb. Not impossible, but really? Guns serve several purposes. It is not the gun's fault or the law abiding citizen if some nut case uses a gun to take out his frustration.
The problem is still blatantly the perpetrator, NOT the gun. Time to think realistically and work on a solvable problem, rather than trying to eliminate the instrument of the crime.
|
My post "It protected the children?" was in reference to THIS thread, not some random event some place. And NO 19 children are dead, they were not protected by the 2nd amendment, they were MURDERED by someone exercising it.
And someone asked earlier about the "guard" and why he didn't stop the shooter, the reason, it the shooter shot the guard first, lucky for the guard I think he survived.