Quote:
Originally Posted by spd2918
The 2nd Ammendment is not about hunting or home protection.
It's about the people having the means to resist a tyranical government.
All "semi-automatic" means is the next bullet is loaded after the last is shot. A revolver loads the next bullet by trigger squeeze (or thumb cocking) and anyone with any skill can achieve the same rate of fire as an AR15. Besides, shooting fast means less accuracy, so it's a wash.
As for the New Zealand and Australia argument, they didn't have many mass shooting before confiscation. Australia did force people into quarantine detention during covid. They could because they did not fear an armed populace.
And the reason gun ownership is up is because people fear a tyranical government. When Seattle allowed a group of Communist thugs to take over the city, people bought guns. When those same Communist thugs laid seige to a Federal Courthouse in Portland, people bought guns.
I'm all for personal choice. If you don't like guns, don't buy one.
|
Australia did what was best for public health during a Covid surge. It is quite a stretch to relate that to how many armed citizens they have. And Australian citizens have plenty of guns - they are just bolt actions NOT semi-automatic. The slower bolt actions allow citizens time to fight back against mass murderers. Also, a limit on rounds in a clip to 5 would definitely slow down a mass murderer - 30 round banana clips are sick and used by inhumane COWARDS!!!!!!!!