Quote:
Originally Posted by Trayderjoe
Yeah.....no. There were a couple of prior posts in this thread that explained why the gun ban was put in place for the upcoming convention when others made similar incorrect statements.
|
The Secret Service is there to protect whoever they're charged with protecting. If the threat is removed (no firearms allowed) then they don't need the Secret Service there. If they need the Secret Service there, it's because it's that presumption of safety doesn't exist.
If everyone was allowed to carry at the Convention, they wouldn't need the secret service, would they?
Because ALL OF THOSE GOOD GUYS would be protecting each other from that one bad guy.
But if the secret service is needed afterall, then the above sentence is untrue.