Quote:
Originally Posted by MDLNB
Actually, no. I did not "make" the original poster's point. There are exceptions to almost any situation. I am sure that most everyone in an NRA meeting feels secure knowing others are carrying. Our government via the SS has a different outlook on the situation. Protection of the asset is a different matter entirely. Ask them for their reasoning or RULES.
Personally, I have no problem with CCW individuals carrying in a church. In the past few years, there have been several church shootings. One was stopped by a man (NRA member?) with a gun. I understand some folks are in great fear of guns and worry that they may go off by themselves and harm humans. Those folks probably should not have a gun, or should take a gun safety course just to know how they work. It says a lot about someone that had to let everyone know that they would not ever be seen in a church. There's more threat of being zapped by the Holy Spirit in church than being shot in one by a gun totin' miscreant.    |
The irony is lost on some of you.
Regardless of which entity is doing the actual ordering of the ban -
The ban is imposed on a forum where a guy is going to speak about his opinion that there should be no bans. And he'll be able to make this statement, from the safety of the only people who are allowed to not abide by that ban, because their job is to protect him personally.
I'm not for banning guns. I'm pro 2A. I'm also pro-non-hypocrisy. The guy who is going to speak, should not be there at all, if the rules are applying ONLY to his personal taxpayer-provided bodyguards.