Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Has parenting been abdicated to screens?
View Single Post
 
Old 06-03-2022, 05:07 AM
jimbomaybe jimbomaybe is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 796
Thanks: 289
Thanked 659 Times in 305 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
The Plug-In Drug: Television, Children, and the Family by Marie Winn was published in 1977. The book was a social criticism of the influence of television on kids…………

Well, Marie Winn, you had no idea in 1977 how far those screens could go.

Screens can easily become the infinitely patient babysitter. I have heard parents pathetically brag about how their 3-year-olds know their way around an iPad screen or phone.

Surly pre-teens and teenagers can be shut up or shut down by just letting them have all the screen time they want.

I have wondered what studies will show about language development in little kids under so much influence from screens in place of time spent interacting with parents, human-to-human style — and what about social skills development?

I don’t know why so many parents are ignoring the glaring fact that to let a child grow up plugged-in is to invite the whole world, and all that entails, into the child’s life.

But, I guess if the kid is plugged in that gives the parents more plug-in time, too……….

I am happy to know parents who take the hardest job in the world seriously and have enough sense to limit screen time and to supervise what they do allow — as kids get older and the presence of screens becomes unavoidable and necessary in some situations. And, of course, education can be enhanced with legitimate online info. I am not totally opposed to screens — but it is all too obvious now that those screens own us as a culture. I wish there were more parents who were not so willing to abdicate their responsibility to a screen — while they just look the other way. (shudder)

Boomerosaurus
Perhaps insidious is to strong a word, and maybe not ,but being plugged in you are just passively receiving information with little effort on the part who is on the receiving end , a one way conversation that diminishes critical thinking of what is being presented. In a conversation one has at least a give and take interaction, it is much easer to influence someone with sound bites. Children in schools and as adults we get little information that is not presented as audio/visual. Reading on the other hand is requires one to process the information, it is something you do, you can reread parts, relate one sentence or paragraph to another, reading skills teach writing skills , organization of thoughts and logic. It is harder to sell BS when it written out. That I think is the real danger of being "plugged in"