How disingenuous of you to exclude most of the paragraph and then take it out of context. Here is the actual, complete paragraph.
“The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. Rather the focus must be upon the prediction of the probability distribution of the system’s future possible states by the generation of ensembles of model solutions. Addressing adequately the statistical nature of climate is computationally intensive and requires the application of new methods of model diagnosis, but such statistical information is essential.”
The important issue in many (most) areas of science is developing a probability distribution since exact (deterministic) outcomes are often impossible to predict. If you were a scientist you might understand this.
To the Moderators: This thread should be closed since nothing intelligent is being said anymore.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding
The entire man-made climate narrative is built upon the climate models -- which have failed for the last 30 years -- except the Russian model which admits CO2 is not a climate driver -- which is why the news will not report this fact. Also, none of the models are worth a penny since none of them can actually replicate past climate changes -- such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age. Additionally, the IPCC said, "The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future exact climate states is not possible." Bottom line -- there is no climate emergency -- just climate alarmism.
|