Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte1
The problem is that when someone responds with an answer, if certain folks do not like the solution, it is immediately discounted as "that will never work."
Some folks say that they answer is guns in the hands of the good guys. I agree. I also believe that stricter penalties is a good deterrent. Unfortunately, then you have to consider that many "mass murderers" are merely performing a suicide by COP and no deterrent will work. Before anyone says that guns carried by good guys does not work, how about looking up the stats on how many lives have been saved every year by someone in possession of a gun. I believe it averages about a million per year are saved by a "good guy" with a gun.
When someone tell me that guns should be limited so they cannot be used to kill so many people in such a short time, I refer them to the fact that a revolver generally holds six rounds (bullets) and fires every time you pull the trigger until empty. A speed loader gives one the ability to reload in seconds. So, then you have someone like a certain person in D.C. that says a shot gun is all that is needed and that a warning shot in the air will solve the problem. Shot guns are also manufactured in the semi-automatic version, the pump version and the breech loaded style.
Now, consider home defense. If you home is being broken into by more than one perp. don't you want to even the odds of survival by having the ability to fire without reloading as much as you would if restricted by a six shot revolver or a shot gun? If the bad guys only had revolvers and were numbered two or more, they they would have twice the ability as you would, even if they were restricted by carrying only a revolver. Capacity of the gun the "good guy" is limited to, is not the answer either.
The fact really is that there is a very low number of folks killed by guns in America compared to the number of folks saved by guns, considering the amount of guns owned in the U.S. If not killed by guns, then by knives, cars, doctors, cancer, heart disease, etc. The only way to lower the killings is to scare the perpetrators into submission. Take away one instrument of murder and you only cause the person to find another. Blah, blah, blah, etc.
|
So many of these posts are written by people who have a view. Freedom of speech I do think it is an important right. It is actually the first amendment, considered the most important.
No where, does it say only those who agree with me can speak. Nor does it say the person speaking needs to know what they are saying is correct.
A revolver, there are revolvers that hold 7 and 9 shots. There are revolvers where you can change the cylinder. Today a revolver costs roughly twice what a semi automatic pistol does.
Why all the posts by both sides? Where we are and my view. Our country, our people, the same people who vote. There is no desire for a compromise. The anti gun people will not stop. The goal for them is NO GUNS. Perhaps interesting. England has greatly restricted guns. They have and sell really powerful air rifles and there are states where a gun is legal but a cross bow is not.
We expect, no demand perfect solutions-THERE ARE NONE. Our supreme court ruled Roe vs Wade is not good law and abortion would be a state issue. OK States rights vs central government. Same court ruled that NY gun laws are unconstitutional-central government vs states rights. This battle was the issue in the civil war. The TRUE ISSUE it is perhaps unsolvable.