Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinSE
The question is not that they can, it is that they gave no good legal reason for doing it. Almost everything in the majority opinion was wrong.
|
Again, Nope...
They had a good reason. The initial RvW decision was a bad decision (not because of the content of the decision, that's another debate), but because it was wrong of the court to try to establish a law. It is not their job to do that. That power belongs to the legislative branch...
RBG explained that quite clearly...