Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby
Imagine - a man who isn't saddled with unexpected paternity lawsuits, financial obligations, or claims of "oh - I guess my pill didn't work" (when it was actually that the woman wanted to get pregnant and stopped taking her contraceptives).
Imagine - a man who doesn't have to worry about whether or not his condom has a hole in it.
Imagine - a 10-year-old girl who doesn't have to end up pregnant after she's raped.
I'm 100% for government-mandated sterilization of boys when they hit puberty, reversible only the day after their wedding night if both husband and wife agree to it. Afterall, while a woman can only be pregnant once every 9 months, a man can impregnate dozens of women (and girls) during that time frame.
I mean, why not? If it's okay for the government to mandate forced pregnancy on women, why shouldn't they mandate forced sterilization on men? Especially considering that male sterilization is usually just a quick 10-minute office visit and a few hours of soreness. Most men can't "handle it," I know. But I'll bet they'll "rise to the occasion" (puns not only intended, but snickered at).
|
I confess I find your much of your arguments, well somewhat specious, the alternative to setting limits on abortions ends up with "late term abortions" you would have it that the "privacy of your body" should allow something as barbaric as that for no other reason than your preference, that is the question