Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinSE
My wife just pointed out that Beau of the 5th Column, on Youtube, did a piece this, and pointed out that the Supreme Court has as far back as 1981 ruled that the police have no obligation or legal responsibility to PROTECT people. The only legal obligation is to arrest them. If this is true, then the chances are that nothing can be done (like suing the officers). They according to this are not required to do anything to protect people. So much for the Protect and Defend on police cars.
|
Honestly, for some reason, I am no longer comfortable with the SCOTUS as the authority that is actually attempting to protect anyone’s right. They seem to have lost their concern for protecting individual rights. Regardless of the SCOTUS’s thought of any one else’s responsibility, they have just shrugged off their own responsibilities. Do police officers still take an oath to “protect and serve”….. Not one of those cowardice little boys needed permission from the SCOTUS (or their bleeping chief) to do their job and protect those children. I do not know how they can live with themselves after such a disgraceful display of self protection. Do any one of those toy cops have children of their own? Wow, imagine what that father might have done to save his baby? Image how that might have changed the outcome….. Every man in that corridor should be held responsible for their unbelievable cowardice. 🤬 The horror and grief of it all is so incomprehensible and inconceivable, It just blows my mind 🤯