Quote:
Originally Posted by Keedy
The citizenry has been bombarded by the media that the consensus of man-made global warming was fact. The media has been telling us that there is no debate because the consensus said so.
Well, consensus means opinion. It has been drummed into our heads that it cannot be debated. Period. Scientists have been silent to escape ridicule.
Well, the so-called consensus has been shifting the other way and the main stream media doesn't like it.
EPA is a government agency. Think about it. Environment Protection means that they have a vested interest. After all, they do need a boogie man as to have a reason to protect us.
Respected scientists have been coming out of the closest in droves in recent months. Follow the money.. especially taxpayer's money...most of it goes to prove there is man made climate changes....not the other way around. IMHO
|
The knife cuts both ways and neither "side" participating in BS pseudoscience can claim the moral high ground. This should be about science, and real research thus far has compelling arguments for
each side of the debate. Depending on your knowledge, interest, and interpretations one side may have a more compelling argument than the other. There is a plethora of information out there for those that are truly interested in actually learning rather than towing one political line or the other.