Quote:
Originally Posted by cabo35
serenityseeker....thank you for confirming that you never read the 98 page report prior to commenting with such authority on its relevancy, context and authors. Further thanks are in order for the privilege of your intellectually stimulating response.
As to your questions to me regarding collapsing buildings, terrorist attacks and global warming precautions...the answer lies in the scale of the response relative to the scale of the threat, ergo the crux of the debate you seem to take offense and umbrage to.
The thread was not started by me, hence, I do not claim ownership so you can't really give it to me. In retrospect, I may have over personalized my argument.
Really...have a nice evening.
|
Again, your inaccuracies, if not downright lies abound. At no point did I confirm I never read the report, quite the contrary actually.This of course speaks to the validity and/or credibility of your comments as a whole.
The only things I typically take umbrage with are unsolicited attacks and inaccurate, slanted information. As I said, you would do well to research and understand a little science to counterbalance the political rhetoric.