Quote:
Originally Posted by serenityseeker
The knife cuts both ways and neither "side" participating in BS pseudoscience can claim the moral high ground. This should be about science, and real research thus far has compelling arguments for each side of the debate. Depending on your knowledge, interest, and interpretations one side may have a more compelling argument than the other. There is a plethora of information out there for those that are truly interested in actually learning rather than towing one political line or the other.
|
Nobody doubts that there is a plethora of information out there. Information is not scientific evidence. Consenses is not scientific proof. Scientific proof is repeatable. It "is". It doesn't require a bunch of people to agree and argue. It stands on its own merit.
Thus far, the case for global warming, caused by man and repairable by man is not supported by scientific evidence. It is be political in nature. If it is ever proven, I will support reasonable measures, shared by the efforts of the nations of the world. Until then I will fight to be sure that our nation is not destroyed by a bunch of guilty feeling self flaggelating people.
Yoda
A member of the loyal opposition